Cursing the Competent
As long as the Internet economy was happily bubbling ahead, the
Peter Principle reigned supreme: Peter joined a startup and got
promoted quickly. Invariably, he would land in a position
where he not only started failing, but dragged the entire startup
down with his incompetence. Which of course didn't quite
matter, since the Peter Principle was (and is) democratic and made
everybody else look just as stupid as Peter himself.
The economy turned sour, Peter's startup died as everybody
else's, and he scrambles to find a new job. Of course, he will
want a stable company, with lots of cash reserves, good
management and excellent products. Since he is good, he lands The
Job, invariably at three hierarchy levels below where he was,
with maybe half the salary. But who complains?
Around Peter all the people that have been there before him.
They are a little afraid, since they know they kept their position
because their company did well, not because they were better than
poor Peter. Russian roulette of startups. The manager might not
even have been able to get hired in Peter's old company. But that
really doesn't matter.
Peter works hard, as he's used. He solves any
problem in half the time that anyone else takes. Which doesn't
make him a popular guy on the block. In particular, his manager
knows how she will be followed in her every action with the critical
eye of someone that used to supervise her likes. And that's when
Peter is hit by the Curse of the Competent.
Peter the Competent
To a certain extent, the Curse of the Competent is the mirror
image of the Peter Principle. While the latter states that
"Everybody gets promoted to their level of
incompetence", the former simply states that "The competent
gets to do everything" You think that's a good thing?
Well, think again.
Where the Peter Principle holds (almost everywhere), there are
loads of incompetent people. That's wonderful, bright,
industrious, diligent people that are perfect at everything, except
what they are doing right now. That's what the Peter
Principle is all about, isn't it?
There is a conspiracy around these incompetents: they can't
be blamed for their failure, and their superiors surely do not
want to be blamed for it, either. Their reports either move on to
another job or hope the incompetence will be filtered out at some
point, which is when they get their chance (and will invariably be
moved to their own Peter Equilibrium Point).
Someone has to do the Work! Which is where Peter the Competent
comes in. Peter's manager (who can't really stand him)
sees how her report can handle about anything that comes across
him. And lo and behold, anything quickly morphs into everything.
At every critical juncture, the manager has to assign tasks. Peter
can handle it, so he gets to do it. The incompetents cannot handle
it, so they don't have to.
Still, What's Bad About It?
High-technology is an interesting world: a skilled worker will
have a productivity factors higher than a lesser skilled one - but
the compensation for both does not differ by factors.
In a separate essay, you'll read how
this is an anomaly in history, instead of the norm.
In an environment with built-in upside, as was the case during
the end of the past millennium, competence was rewarded by growth.
In that ancient world, the upside was distributed unequally,
generating a differentiation engine for the competent.
In this new environment, there is no growth that compares with
what we had. The Peter Principle finally holds us hostage, in that
while some cannot move away from their Peter Equilibrium Point,
others (the Competents) will not be able to even reach it.
Work has to be done. Good people do a lot of good work. Hence
good people get to do all the work BUT... But they don't get
any upside, because there is no upside to distribute. The
Competents are in the firm claws of their Curse, subject to envy,
jealousy, distrust, and reverse favoritism. They will be left out
of decision making (because they know better), left out of perk
distribution (just because they are unwelcome hostages), left out
of career opportunities (because someone else is less dangerous).
Avoiding the Curse
One harsh word first: you cannot avoid the Curse of
the Competent and gain the upside. The only way you can beat your
fate is by skillfully avoiding to be recognized as a Competent.
First, you have to completely avoid the perception you might be
better at anything than your colleagues. Do not speak in meetings
unless you are asked something, always look bored. Come in at
irregular hours, don't try to impress anyone. Once in a
while, come up with a positive surprise, but keep your profile
low.
Second, keep your mouth shut. I've seen examples where a
poor decision maker forced a particular choice that ended up
costing the company millions of dollars in revenue. The Competent
in this case warned ahead of time: whisper, dialog, argument and
shout didn't do anything but firm up the resolve of the
manager and mark the Competent as such. A dreadful fate.
Third, limit your competence to a supporting role for the
Peter Principled. They will appreciate your help more than your
Competence, and you will be allowed to avoid the Curse of the
Competent by being a Nice Guy. Nice Guys are those people we pass
up for a promotion but that we don't punish for deserving
one.
How Do You Change the Environment?
If you are caught in the Curse of the Competent, there is
nothing you can do. People percieve you as threatening (their
position, mostly) and will avoid a strengthening of your influence
at all cost. So, try to never enter an environment in which you
are doomed by the Curse.
If you are high up in the corporate food chain, you can apply
modern means of management and start insinuating that the upside
belongs to the Competent. You'll need to have tangible
criteria for competence, and you have to apply them consistently.
Make it clear that you will not tolerate incompetence. Fire people
for incompetence, without ever saying so, but with consistency.
Soon, the demographics around you will change. People will
leave saying you are a tyrant and your demands impossible. But
when you check back, you'll see that those that left were not
your Competents. Competents generally don't mind harshness.
They read Ayn Rand and think everyone should deserve what he or
she earns.
The tenor in your team will be less jovial, most likely. People
know they are there for a reason, and that that reason is not
called 'human warmth', but making money. It is
incredible how many people never really stop to think that the
purpose of work for the corporation is solely money. Not
recognition, not personal growth, not satisfaction. Just money.
At some point, the team will be mostly made of Competents.
People that admit they are wrong, even though grudgingly. And then
you'll have to fight the Primadonna Paradox and the Food
Chain Poisoning. But compared to the Curse of the Competent,
that's cheap.
The Short Version, Please!
In most companies you'll find some people caught in their
Peter Equilibrium Point; unable to move up or down and incapable
of performing their function, they will hit everyone around them
that even remotely looks like a potential threat.
In the high-tech field, we see the Peter Principle applied to
entire companies. Initial sudden growth stops equally suddenly,
and the whole enterprise is frozen in an odd Peter State, in which
most people shouldn't do what they are doing, but since the
position that would suit their competence is neither available nor
compensated enough, they prefer stayind put.
Once you join such an environment from the outside, you are
typically going to be hired into a position in which you are
competent. Which means you will be an anomaly, a threat. When the
perception is born that you are good at what you are doing, people
will start being jealous and frightful, and you are subjected to
the Curse of the Competent. And that is when you are to do
everything (especially what other people don't want to do), but
are not proportionately compensated with the upside that the
company has to offer.
If you want to avoid this horrible fate, do not show
Competence. Make Peter Equilibrium People feel at ease by allowing
them to make stupid decisions. If you are in a position to
influence the direction of the company, get rid of the Peter
Equilibrium People. If you aren't, run away as soon as
you can.